The tripartite model of attitude, also known as the ABC model, breaks attitudes down to their three components.
The three components of attitude are:
- Affective Attitude – how we feel about something.
- Behavioral Attitude – what we do about something.
- Cognitive Attitude – how we think about something.
This model helps us to define attitudes and deconstruct them to see what’s going on under the surface.
Sometimes, affect is influencing behavior more than cognition (when we make impulse purchases, for example). Other times, cognition wins over (such as when we want something but decide not to get it right now because it’s too expensive).
The ABC model of attitude can be used by marketers to find out why someone would want to buy a product (and better package it!) as well as psychologists to help people self-reflect on their own behaviors.
The model emerged from the Yale University Communication and Attitude Program in the 1950s and 60s. However, note that this model has fallen out of favor in recent decades, as discussed in our ‘criticisms’ section later in this article.
The Structure of Attitude
Attitude is structured into three components: affect, behavior, and cognition.
In this model, we consider there to be an “attitude object” that our attitudes and behaviors are directed at.
The affective component of attitude refers to how we feel about something. It’s often our initial reaction and might be positive or negative, such as a fear-based reaction or an excitement-based reaction.
It’s important to separate affect from cognition, where affect is what we feel and cognition is what we think.
Our affective responses might be driven by deep-seeded memories or experiences that shape our feelings about things. For example, our negative past experiences with certain animals may inform our current feelings toward them.
Some examples include:
- Being excited about a song because it reminds us of a loved one.
- Being repulsed by a smell because we have associated it with a bad memory.
- Being afraid of a lion because we’ve never seen one before.
The behavioral component of attitude refers to our intentions, or what we would do.
It can be informed by our attitude or cognition. For example, if we’re afraid of something (our affect), we might run (our behavior). Similarly, if we
However, the behavioral component is generally understood to be malleable. If a marketer does a good job at marketing a product, they can influence the behavior so that it is favorable (i.e. that the person purchases the product).
The behavior is also often influenced by the ‘cognitive’ component, discussed next.
Our cognitive component is what we think about something. It’s what happens when we pause and really think hard about it.
Cognitive and affective components are interrelated, but don’t always overlap.
For example, we might think it’s a bad idea to take a holiday, even though we have positive feelings about it, because it’s too expensive. That’s because we’re overriding our impulsive feelings in order to make decisions based on logic.
Sequence of Attitudes in the Tripartite Model
Affect, behavior or cognition could each win out in a decision. This changes depending on the situation. So, different ones come first, second and third at different times.
Here are some examples:
- Affect-Behavior-Cognition: A person needs to make a decision that is low-cost, such as buying an ice cream. Affect might be more important than cognition here, as there is low risk in this action.
- Cognition-Affect-Behavior: A person needs to buy gas for their car. They know they need gas for the car to drive, but don’t want to spend the money. The cognition here wins over because it’s more important that the task be done than attending to your negative feelings about the task.
- Behavior-Cognition-Affect: A person buys a vacuum cleaner, which turns out to fail after a week. They re-assess how they think of the purchase (it wasn’t worthwhile!) and now have a negative affect (dislike for) toward the object or brand.
Which Wins Out?
We’ll often try to reflect on which of the three components in the ABC model will “win” and force a behavior.
- Cognitive: “This is an expensive appliance”
- Affective: “This appliance gives me pleasure”
- Behavioral: “This appliance has served me well in the past”
Here, the conflict between cognitive and affective components of attitude may be resolved by the third – past experience – which might be enough to cause a consumer to make a purchase.
Here are some more examples:
|Attitude Object||Affect||Behavior||Cognition||Likely Sequence|
|Puppy dog||Adoration||Pet the dog||Dogs are friendly||Affect-Cognition-Behavior|
|McDonald’s||Hunger||Don’t buy the burger.||Junk Food is unhealthy.||Affect-Cognition-Behavior|
|Beer||Like a drink||Getting Drunk||You’ll regret it!||Affect-Behavior-Cognition|
|Cleaning the house||It’s Boring||Avoidance||It needs to be done.||Cognition-Affect-Behavior|
The ABC model has largely fallen out of favor in social psychology since the 1990s because it is widely understood that behavior should not be subsumed under attitude. They should, perhaps, instead be considered as separate things. As Sutton & Douglas (2020, p. 151) argue:
“We want to study how people’s behavior is related to how they think and feel about attitude objects. We do not want to simply define their behavior as an inherent part of their attitude.”
Nonetheless, this model is useful for students to start thinking about how attitudes are formed and how we can influence behaviors by looking deeper at people’s cognitive and affective reactions to attitude objects.
Read Next: A full list of 29 motivation theories
 Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. (2014). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage.
 Sutton, R. & Douglas, K. (2020). Social Psychology. London: Springer.
 McCabe, S. (2010). Marketing communications in tourism and hospitality. Los Angeles: Routledge.
Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education.